Note / Hassan Sadeghian

Anchorage of America in eastern Forat; the beginning of the decomposition of Syria

The different attendance of the United States in eastern Euphrates and the occupation of northern Syria by the use of modern military tackle and the deployment of more than 30,000 troops is a clear sign of the US lobbying.

News ID: 68826

Date: 24 February 2018 - 05:52

Accordimg to Defapress international reporter - Hassan Sadeghian; after the end of the ISIL project, there has been a time decomposition and division; the different US attendance in the East Euphrates and the occupation of northern Syria with modern military apparatus and the disposition of more than 30,000 militaries, signs It is clearly fastening in this country. In fact, the United States wants to start an autonomous government containing of Kurdish forces, counting PKK, YPP and a part of the Turkish Kurdish forces, the PKK, in eastern Euphrates; the acceptance of The Pentagon's $ 550 million budget support for the Syrian Kurdish forces and the deployment of a heavy-duty and modern military equipment in the eastern Euphrates is a clear proof of this.

The US events are in fact part of the strategy to "make a quasi-government in a large part of Syria's terrain on the eastern coast of the Euphrates River to the Iraqi border." According to an Anatolian news agency, according to a Pentagon examination, the number of American troops in Syria has amplified fourfold among October and December last year to around 2,000. The number of skilled US Army workers in Syria has been projected at 12,500 people, representative more than 11,000 of them as the "Syrian Democratic Forces" (PKK and PES terrorists). According to the report, more than 3,000 militants (PKK and PID), known as the "Syrian Democratic Forces", have been trained under the name of “Roghe” internal security forces.

In general, the United States is following two aims in Syria:

The exploitation of "oil", with the income of black gold, will also finance the cost of their military weapons and boost their comparatively anxious economies.

More burden on Iran and perhaps a direct war
Naturally, another part of the story belongs to countries such as Russia, Iran and Turkey, although the group has so far supported the protection of the regional integrity of Syria, but today circumstances are dissimilar. As if there were no choices for sharing. The attendance of the Turkish Army in Afarin is also within this framework; Turkey's attempt to create a safe area at a depth of 30 kilometers in the afternoon and linking it to the Azaz-Jarabols edge bar is in fact an influence. Turkey has understood otherwise well that neither Bashar al-Assad nor the Syrians are in the control of the Syrians, nor that the Syrian Kurds supported by the United States can be eradicated; therefore, the only way is to seize areas such as those that are not planned areas under the control of American forces.

Iran and Russia, of course, do not have the means to protect Bashar al-Assad in order to defend the affected territories; they also know well that there is no longer the option of the rule of Bashar al-Assad in the territorial integrity. Of sequence, the presence of Russia in Syria and the support of Bashar al-Assad are more of a kind of power movement than the local and global impartialities, but we must not overlook that Russia's lack of meddling in oil-rich expanses of Syria (east of Euphrates) is against silence and The US did not enter the Iraqi Kurdistan Oil Equations.

But for Iran, the protection of Bashar al-Assad is vital and of planned rank that has already been achieved. But with the direct presence of the United States in Syria and the imprisonment of at least a neighborhood of the territory, it will be a bit firmer to work; the Kurdish association with the opposition and other terrorist groups under US command and control can put Bashar Assad's government in Tagana.

Message end