Defapress reports;

Americans' Divers in Saudi Nuclear Program / Trump justification for nuclear deal with Al Saud

Given the political and religious conditions in Saudi Arabia and the country's gaining of nuclear weapons, the consequences of this would primarily cause danger to US security.

News ID: 69006

Date: 04 March 2018 - 18:21

According to inetrnational reporter of Defapress: The request was made by Saudi crown prince Mohamed bin Salman to finalize nuclear power plants in the country after the trips made by President Trump, US National Security Advisor Jert Kouchner and Minister of State Energy Trust Rick Perry He was in Riyadh with a multi-billion dollar agreement with Saudi Arabia, taking a more serious form.

For this reason, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia has given a one-month deadline to finalize the contract to Westinghouse, which is on the brink of bankruptcy and Saudi dollars can save it. American journals have said that the Trump government is a quandary because, on the one hand, it agreements billions of dollars to American companies, and on the other hand, according to a policy announced earlier, the Trump government is in inconsistency with the "US Nuclear Policy Doctrine."

With Saudi foreign crown prince Mohamed bin Salman and the younger class, Saudi Arabia's ambitions, with the change in its foreign policy, the alliance with yesterday's enemies (Israel) and friends, seems to have a important financial possible and a claim for position with Iran in the district. Has sought to imprison the country's nuclear energy, As the Saudi government has announced, it plans to build 16 nuclear reactors worth more than $ 100 billion.

Nearly three decades before the victory of the Islamic Revolution of Iran in the 1977s, there were three major powers in the Middle East, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq, and their relations often formed in the field of competition towards each other, and Saudi Arabia was always trying to align with one of the two powers In opposition to the third power. Before the victory of the Islamic Revolution, Iran and Saudi Arabia preserved the interests of the United States against the alignment of the Eastern bloc and Iraq, and after the revolution, Saudi Arabia came to the aid of Iraq throughout the eight years of holy defense against Iran.

After the occupation of Kuwait by Iraq, Saudi politics changed to an alliance with the West. The current status of Saudi Arabia is derived from the huge reserves of energy and the Holy Shrine of Islam in the Islamic world, which on this basis claims the leadership of the Islamic world.

The Saudis announced the aim of constructing these reactors in the Middle East, complementary or balancing with Iran. Some other analysts believe the country's other nuclear energy, status, or international reliability. But the realism is that even with this reason, Saudi Arabia will not get anything like that, with Israel having 200 atomic bombs, is not capable of security in Tel Aviv and did not have credibility at international level. On the other hand, the group of credibility and prestige is a category that depends on the culture, civilization and the performance of countries on the international level, not on deadly weapons.

US hypocritical politics in the nuclear debate

For a long time, the announcement of the "TrUmp Nuclear Doctrine" has not been passed, and now the United States has announced that there has been a two-way deal with Saudi Arabia on initiation a nuclear reactor for Saudis. It should be noted that in the approach presented by Trump, the certainty of non-proliferation and fulfillment with the present arms control agreements was unequivocally mentioned. The government of Tramp has made some partialitys for a nuclear deal with Saudis, such as cooperation with Saudi Arabia, which has brought economic prosperity to many American companies and supplied billions of dollars to the US economy, or the failure to conclude with Saudi Arabia, that other countries such as Russia, France and other nuclear countries take this good occasion to invest.

American newspapers have said that if the United States proposes to finish a nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia, then it should review and admit non-proliferation laws, in which case Washington has taken a main security risk and encourages Middle Eastern countries to compete for technology Is nuclear.

The presentation of Saudi Arabia has shown well that it is a surprised power not only in the region but also in the world. It is irrational to give a nuclear weapon to a country that has been scaring the people of the country for three years, because of the horror of the position in Yemen. The country's harsh policies towards Bahrain and Yemen, a major effort to spread fundamentalism and Wahhabism in the Muslim world that has doubled the power of terrorism in the region, and at the inhabited level, has spread terrorism in the Western and even the United States (for example, The attack on the twin towers of the United States, by Osama bin Laden, is a Muslim Wahhabi Muslim from Saudi Arabia) will cost a lot to everyone, including the United States itself.

The entry of Saudi Arabia into the nuclear domain, given its political and spiritual conditions, could, in the long term, make it a weapon, would make this dangerous weapon at the hands of extreme Salafi, Wahhabi and ISIS supporters who have the consequences. Its future will primarily endanger US security.
In Iran's nuclear program, one of the blemishes that was always raised by the US and the West was that Iran has access to a wealth of hydrocarbon resources and, after Saudi Arabia, is the second largest source of oil and, after Russia, has the second largest source of gas in the world.

But with so much energy resources, why are you looking for a nuclear program, even for peaceful reasons, such as non-fossil energy supplies? Iran's population is more than three times that of Saudi Arabia, and many years before the victory of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, the Americans themselves had warned that if Iran did not seek to use nuclear energy and replace nuclear energy before 2000, Exports of oil and gas are revised and reduced, so that they can meet their domestic expenditure.

On the other hand, this is true of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia's fossil treasury are much higher than Iran's production and export, and the continuation of this exploitation for Saudi Arabia, which has a population of about one-third of Iran, is much higher than Iran, so Saudi Arabia's exchange to the nuclear program has no economic justification. Saudi analysts claim that while we have enough oil, we need another energy that we can restore whenever it is needed; that's why we are looking for nuclear power. It should be noted that Saudi Arabia has a even 270 billion barrels of oil set asides that has been replacing it for decades.

On the other hand, there is a guarantee that a country that is the source of many of the challenges in the region has used all its attempts in spreading terrorism, with the help of its American lobby, the US has drawn the West's attention to deliberations, because of Iran's nuclear threat and the Shiite Crescent, With US support, is bombarding Yemeni people every day after withdrawing from the US nuclear umbrella and achieving its aspirations.

Saudi Arabia's justification for building nuclear reactors intended to balance Iran's power in the region is also very rigorous and far from the reason, as Saudi Arabia faces an effective human resource challenge, and the country is in terms of nuclear science and technology At a very low level. Acquiring nuclear technology in this country is not endogenous, which means that domestic experts in Saudi Arabia cannot even manage a small industry, and therefore they have to import this technology from abroad, in which case the independence of their votes in this area will be incomplete.

Countries like Saudi Arabia are obliged to import nuclear fuel (uranium enriched) in their nuclear contracts to the industries of their country of origin (US), which is, of course, not allowed to use the industry strategically. Meanwhile, Iran had a problem with the West because of its sovereign independence in nuclear fuel with the West, and wanted to enrich its nuclear fuel inside the country; Iranian nuclear scientists, unlike Saudi Arabia, have good nuclear knowledge and are capable of without any further support. Countries set up their own nuclear industries, so Saudi Arabia cannot compete with Iran in the nuclear industry.

However, if Saudi Arabia is to look for a nuclear weapon, Iran will surely have the right to defend itself. Then the United States has faced the Middle East with a main confront that could not be attractive to it as a threat to Saudi Arabia becoming a nuclear power. A country that wants nuclear energy should be an international weight to the amount that it is not Saudi Arabia, because it does not have a coherent internal arrangement, and the likelihood of a challenge in this country is unlikely to be, if the nuclear program is handled by the fundamentalist group Falls in this country; the United States will be in trouble.

Saudi Arabia's access to nuclear weapons will not provide any sufficient safeguards for the West and, in particular, the United States for nuclear deterrence, and will imperil the threat of a nuclear war not only in the Middle East, but also around the world, which will definitely be the main victim of the United States.

Message end