CNN reported that Donald Trump, following a serious warning from the first vice president and commander of the US terrorist army that the Pentagon's strategic ammunition was running out, abandoned the illusion of a major attack on the holy land of Iran and resumed the path of a ceasefire.
Ukraine’s attack on an Iranian ship in the Caspian Sea was a test of the sensitivity of Iran’s Armed Forces and must be accompanied by a calculated and powerful response. If the Kyiv regime continues, it will become a serious threat to Russia and Iran.
In the first phase of the regional war, Iran resisted the blows of the United States and Israel. In the next step, it defeated the enemy by attacking the Arab countries bordering the Persian Gulf and taking control of the Strait of Hormuz.
By blocking the Strait of Hormuz and crushing the energy infrastructure of America’s allies in the Persian Gulf, Iran forced Trump to back down and agree to a humiliating MoU.
By hastily canceling the Islamabad MoU, Trump has plunged the White House into a new war of attrition with Iran. Now, with rising fuel prices and Trump’s popularity waning, Republicans are on the verge of losing the election.
Iran’s missile capabilities have been developed in recent months to such an extent that they are capable of bypassing US defense and interception systems in the region.
Riyadh now finds itself enduring the consequences of a war it neither chose nor approved. Thus, the US is seen in Saudi strategic calculations simultaneously and paradoxically as a security partner and a source of danger.
Donald Trump is by no means the first foreign ruler to fall into misery after launching an ill-advised military operation against Iran. At least four Roman figures, influenced by pride and ignorance, launched military attacks on Iran, each of which ended in disaster.
The American think tank Quincy has warned of the unprecedented dependence of the US military sector on the Zionist regime in an analysis assessing the US-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative.
The American think tank Quincy Institute has examined the possibility of ground operations by the US terrorist army in an analysis, noting that ideas such as seizing the strategic islands of Abu Musa, Greater and Lesser Tunb, Lark, and Kharg will not only not force Tehran to retreat, but will also trap the US army in a quagmire.