Syria's Importance to Foreign Policy of France /Paris seeks to revive its power in West Asia

According to the international Defapress reporter: Although the change in the foreign policy of France in Syria was due to the strategy of the "overthrow of Bashar al-Assad", which was pursued by “François Hollande”, the socialist and former president of the country, a more rational strategy from the current President “Emmanuel Macron” But historical experience shows that France has always sought to retain domination over dinner, and it will be in the future.

The land of dinner in ancient times was part of the territories of the Roman Empire and then the Roman Empire (Byzantium). The Roman Empire is the largest water-soil government in the world today. The beginning of the European connection with the land of dinner dates back to this era.

After the division of the Roman Empire into two eastern and western kingdoms, Western European connections with Syria's ports were maintained; however, the re-entry of European forces on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean Sea, this time in the form of the so-called sacred crusades, once again, the people of Europe, especially France, provided dinner with the people.

The Crusades and the presence of the present-day French people (Old Flags and Old Believers) among the Crusaders in Palestine and in the dinner caused them to experience the experiences of many Muslims in science and technology unknown to them. The connection between the Knights of the Cross and the Jewish priests and the learning of the secret acts and witchcraft of the Jews (known as Kabbalah) occurred at the same time.

In the following years and after the Renaissance, the British and the French realized the importance of the Eastern Mediterranean region to stretch their influence on the East, more than ever before. As a result, significant competition between Great Britain and France over seizure of more areas in West Asia took place.

The result of this competition was the division of the eastern Mediterranean between England and France, with France dominating Lebanon, Syria and Britain over Iraq, Jordan and Palestine, in addition to the Hajj peninsula. This happened after World War I and the implementation of the Sykes-Pico treaty between England and France.

During the Second World War, Syria was supported by a clash between supporters of the Hitlerite Germany and the British Army and Zionist militias. The Palestinian Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini fatwas played an important role in supporting the German forces.

After the defeat of Germany, the reign of France over Western Asia was restored, and this time, in addition to Syria, a new entity called the "Zionist regime" (fake Israel) was formed that had the support of Paris. Independence of Zionist Jews was endorsed by France in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which kept Syria and Lebanon colonized.

Eventually, the national forces struggle in Syria and the country was liberated from French colonialism on April 17, 1946. However, French intervention in Syria continued. One of the most prominent examples of this intervention is the French support for the Zionist regime in the wars of this aggressive regime with Syria.

The next confrontation between Syria and France should be sought in relation to Iraq, the rival of Syria. Although the Ba'ath party was dominant in both countries, France supported Iraq because of differences between the two countries. This support was also demonstrated in the country's imposed war against the Islamic Republic of Iran, as Syria was the only Arab state to refrain from supporting Saddam in the war and at that time had a good relationship with Iran.

This later on in the Lebanon subject itself to another. France accused Syria of assassinating Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, which led to the withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon and the launch of the Zionist regime's invasion of the country in the summer of 2006 and the 33-day war, part of the French counteraction project With "Syrian power".

The most critical event in the ongoing developments between France and Syria in the current century is the support of the French government for the Takfiri terrorists of the enemy of the Syrian government and the centerpiece of Islamic resistance.

At the time of “Francois Hollande”, the so-called leftist and socialist president of France, this support was most obvious.

Many leaders and leaders, in addition to the commanders and officials of the so-called "moderate" terrorist groups, went to Paris to visit or participate in political and media programs to use it as a platform and a base against “Bashar al-Assad”.

The issue that further aggravated this support was the use of the authorities of the elyse Palace to be angry at the terrorist attacks in Paris. This led the French to support and accompany the US military intervention in Syria.

The end of “Francois Hollande” and the arrival of Emmanuel Macron can be seen as a kind of change in French foreign policy towards the start of the terrorist war in Syria.

After observing the widespread victories of the Islamic Resistance Front and having a strong coalition between resistance-oriented governments in the fight against terrorism, Macron has realized that if France is not lost, it certainly will not win.

Understanding the same subject in the context of the political situation in Lebanon, he played a neutral role in the events surrounding the compulsory resignation of “Saad Hariri” and, without taking a sharp stance on the Saudi regime's actions, provided Hariri's return to Lebanon.
For this reason, the new French president, who is politically neither a liberal nor a socialist, has decided to maintain a strategic relationship with the United States, from the Second World War to today, to speak of a policy of dialogue with Syria, in addition to Bypassing France from the war in Syria, it will work peacefully to revive its past power in the Shiites.

However, it seems unlikely that a novice Macro in the world of politics could change the direction that General De Gaulle, with the help of the United States and Britain after the end of the Second World War, has evolved to shape the role of France in the world.

On the other hand, the desire to revive France's lost power in the world, as evidenced by Macron's recent remarks, shows that France, whether Napoleon holds power, or Macron, asks for the restoration of its past power on the coast Mediterranean, and this policy, even if it is in the shadow of a larger power called the United States, is not changeable.

Message end