NATO from the beginning to the security delusion, security illusion / Americans seek to disrupt the image of Iran

According to the international Defapress reporter, after the disappointment of the Soviet Union, he continued to work on the excuse of defensive the "New World Order." NATO actions, first in Yugoslavia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, the Black Oil crisis, the 9/11 actions, and the Ukrainian crisis (in order to join Ukraine with NATO, which has been opposed by Russia). NATO’S disappointment in many of these actions imitates the uselessness of this organization; for example, the disappointment of NATO in Lebanon, Afghanistan and Libya.

In 1982, NATO was first organized in Lebanon because of the profession of Lebanon by Israel. NATO's impartial of attractive in Lebanon as an sovereign country whose regional honesty was dishonored was essentially to combine the attainments of Israel in the region, in which the Palestinian administrations were involuntary to leave Lebanon by NATO after the creation of the confrontation of Hezbollah and the attack on The US Marines headquarters and the bombing of the Zionist and French military vile in southern Lebanon left the Zionist occupation and NATO failed to carry out the security of Israel in southern Lebanon.

NATO's next action after the September 11, 2001 disaster, NATO forces attacked Afghanistan with the US command, without addressing the topic at the UN and agreement among members of the Security Assembly. The main tenacity of the attack was to fight the terrorists, which caused in the killing of thousands of blameless people. Other US aims in this area were the complete devastation of al-Qaeda and the Taliban to restore security and steadiness to the region, but none of these goals have been put into practice.

Now more than 16 years have passed since the US occupation, US and NATO forces in Afghanistan have not yet been able to eradicate and cleanse terrorism in the area, which mirrors the complete defeat of the US-NATO military in Afghanistan.

US emeritus General Petraeus, who had previously commanded US forces in Afghanistan, by your own admission that terrorist groups in the region have become more influential in the region. The vast multibillion dollar costs and lengthy presence of US forces in the area have led them to only afford military training and advise the Afghan forces on countering terrorism. NATO announced that it will continue to provide its civilian presence in Afghanistan as needed.

NATO pronounced in early 2011 (March 27th) that it intends to unveiling a military operation against Libya based on the Security Council resolutions of 1970 and 1973, aimed at supporting the Libyan civilians criticized by Gaddafi forces. Whose operations contain of three parts: the embargo and rejection of military weapons, the application of a forbidden flying area, and eventually the defense of private citizen. NATO, bouts in Libya led to the debacle of Gaddafi, but left a deeper pond for NATO's real goals, as the treaty is a military alliance requiring collective defense in the event of an invasion or invasion of a NATO associate state. Unlike Afghanistan, the terrorist attack on the United States was ambitious by the Taliban ruling over Afghanistan, but for Libya, neither Libya nor Gaddafi's enthusiasts had any beating on a NATO member. Libya's experience has shown that NATO cannot be proclaimed as the military arm of the Security Council (which Americans insist on).

The undesirable belongings of NATO military processes have occasioned in the demises and wounds of a large number of Libyan unemployed people and the extensive obliteration of the country's substructure, followed by a piercing reaction from some republics as a warning to NATO's repeat of this situation in other countries.

The character of Iran in the region and NATO

The Islamic Revolution of Iran has experienced very difficult experiences. Since the very beginning of the war of revolution compulsory by the United States and its allies, and predominantly heavy monetary sanctions, Iran has begun to production military apparatus for its security, which is the product of its nonstop efforts to produce intuitive missiles. Powerfully defend the regional honesty of our land. Iran's relative self-sufficiency in military dimension, Iran's ability to use nuclear supremacy for civilian use, especially nuclear medicine, and the success of building different products using this industry, exemplifies the competence of Iran as a regional power in the Middle East.

Iran as a country that has an obliging and active role in associating peace and security in the region. According to Dergylyovsky, a professor at the Moscow State University's Department of International Relations, filling to US and western support and cleverness ropes from the Arab countries from the terrorist groups of the region and ISIL, acclaimed Iran's policy of challenging and aggressive terrorism and ISIl. Middle East researcher “Gary SIK” at the Columbia City College highlights that Iran's retort to the region's problems is important from the US standpoint, because Iran is regarding its nationals in peace and concerning global law.

Iran's ability to resolution arguments and experiments of the region, such as arbitration of Iran in resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh topic and Tajikistan, using the cultural mainstay and historical background of the two countries, announces Iran ready for arbitration between Delilah and Islamabad in the Kashmir disaster, on the request of the former president. Yemen from Iran and Hezbollah to arbitrate its changes with Ansarullah Yemen, the growth of regional collaboration of Iran with its nationals in the parts of transit, environment, energy, banking, tourism and philanthropic assistance of Iran to adjacent and non-neighboring countries in need, such as Afghanistan, Azerbaijan , Yemen, Syria, Myanmar, Somalia, Iran as an powerful regional power display.

The unpredictability of the region by terrorist groups and the formation of tautness between different ethnic groups or the request of the Arab countries of the region for the presence of the United States due to the territory arising from the vast publicity apparatus of the West delivers a way for NATO to be present in the region. Nevertheless, the development and the spread of NATO in the Middle East has always been a major barricade to Iran. NATO operations in Afghanistan, and the creation of plentiful military bases in the country in order to follow the moves of India, Pakistan, China, and especially Iran. The goals of US officials and the Secretary-General of the United Nations regarding the long-term deployment of US forces in Afghanistan to develop this country are not limited to founding a permanent military attendance in the United States (especially through NATO) in the region.

In general, NATO's actions in some countries, such as Afghanistan and Lebanon, have been accompanied by massive defeats, which have had a lot of financial and financial costs both for the members of this pact and the guiltless people who have been beset by NATO. Iran as a regional power for the United States and the West is a major impediment to the realization of their plans, so they are seeking to garble the image of the Islamic Republic of Iran, especially in the region.

Message end
Tags: NATO , US , Iran , regional power , Israel , Israel , Iran , terror , defense , terrorist