Iran's representative to the United Nations notes in the New York Times
According to Defapress report, "Gholam Ali Khoshroo» our representative at the United Nations, today in an article in the New York Times, recent rhetoric," Donald Trump "the President regarding theJCPOA.
The English translation of the full text of the notes continue:
Trump Government on October 15 for the third decision adherence should be my country, Iran, to a comprehensive joint action plan – an agreement between Iran and the nuclear years 2015, permanent member of the Security Council plus Germany 5-the certificate or not! This certificate is not part of their agreement that the International Atomic Energy Agency as the only competent entity for verification of Iran's adherence. The idea of the United States Congress, the White House certified in 2015.this is a question of internal American issue, although that could potentially adapt us obligations affected by the nuclear agreement.
Trump has two State visits in April and July confirmed the adherence of Iran. The International Atomic Energy Agency after hundreds of our adherence to the inspection of our obligations under the agreement on 8 report has confirmed. European countries also have concerns. Despite this, on the eve of October 15 has been reported that the Government of Iran's commitment certificate of Trump will withhold it would be imposing sanctions by Congress in violation of the agreement.
The President and the hardliners in Washington have some reason to think the White House should pursue this route. But their views based on a series of false assumptions about the agreement that formed it is necessary to explain about it.
First that some opponents claim agreement JCPOA agreed the worst of the United States with another country. This claim forget one important fact: the nuclear agreement is a bilateral agreement between Tehran and Washington. In fact, the multilateral agreement that requires the approval of Congress or the House of Iran. But a UN Security Council resolution. The cause of the widespread support of members of the Security Council and the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Antonio goiters, the agreement is also the same applies.
The second incorrect given that toque meant to dictate the policies of Iran's nuclear program with disconnected issues. Never more has never been like this. It's always been clear that the road to a nuclear agreement is meant to separate the other geopolitical concerns. All those years have involved lead to JCPOA dialog, the amerra authentication. For example, even when Russia and the United States on the other issues in the Middle East disagreed, to be able to cooperate in the negotiations table.
The current report represents the Government's desire to trump the nuclear agreement with Iran's missile programs that are totally beyond the purpose of JCPOA. Security Council resolution 2231 nuclear agreement that comes in, Iran invited on a rocket designed to carry a nuclear weapon capability does not work. But my country seeks to develop or acquire nuclear weapons, and this phraseology that carefully negotiated and prepared, we have the development of preventive conventional military technology that many other countries are not open.
The third related to the improper regulations given the deterioration of this clause in the agreement is a possible sunset figure that Iran is within a decade of any inspection or limit on most graduates of the nuclear program. It is true that some of the provisions relating to the restrictions will end but the important aspects of the inspections will end. In addition, the agreement stipulated that the other 6 years from now – assuming all parties of their obligations to adhere to the Protocol should be Iran-nuclear safeguards as part of the Treaty of non-spread adoption. This is an extensive international inspections of Iran's nuclear agency in the country I'm in. After the time period set forth in the Iranian nuclear program, the most berjam, for medical purposes and energy as an ordinary member of the international community and the signatory of the Treaty of non-proliferation, will continue.
We Iranians – like all other Nations in the negotiations berjam, the international community and non-proliferation, nuclear experts agree is an important diplomatic achievement to know that the international regime for the non-credit spread. From among the 7 country that nuclear agreement negotiations, the conclusion of the agreement in just Americas talk.
Everything that the President and Congress about the certificate again they do finally a domestic issue. But if the United States wants multilateral talks remain valid in the future cannot be against consensus action and international diplomatic efforts to dismiss the past, whether political retaliation against Government or us national interests are part of the reassessment.
Message end/
