US House Votes to Limit Trump’s Use of Force against Iran

The amendment would prohibit funding US military action against Iran unless Congress has declared war or enacted another specific statutory authorization, The Hill reported on Friday.

Some Republicans broke rank to support it, including vocal Trump ally Rep. Matt Gaetz, who co-sponsored the amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). Twenty-seven Republicans sided with Democrats to support the amendment, while seven Democrats voted against it.

Rep. Ro Khanna, the amendment’s chief sponsor, touted the measure as sending a strong signal to Trump.

“It reminds the president that the American people, both Democrats and Republicans, don’t want another war in the Middle East,” Khanna told reporters.

“The president was fully aware of this. This is what he said when he campaigned, and he’s probably going to want to say it again when he campaigns again. So I think it’s a reminder to him of where public sentiment is and that he shouldn’t get too influenced by the Washington establishment.”

The amendment was a key demand of progressives as Democratic leaders seek their votes to pass the NDAA without Republican support.

Progressives think the NDAA’s $733 billion price tag is too high. But they have indicated they will support the bill anyway if key amendments pass, particularly ones related to Trump’s war powers.

The Iran amendment specifically was seen as urgent amid spiking tensions with Tehran. Trump said last month he was minutes away from launching a military strike on Iran after it shot down a US spy drone over Iran’s territorial waters.

“If my war-hungry colleagues — some of whom have already suggested that we invade Venezuela, North Korea and probably a few other countries before lunch time tomorrow — if they’re so certain in their case against Iran, let them bring their authorization to use military force against Iran to this very floor,” Gaetz said on the House floor.

Most Republicans, though, argued the amendment would tie Trump and the military’s hands in protecting against alleged threats from Iran.

“You don’t handcuff the president, the commander in chief, you don’t handcuff him in advance of any preparation from dealing with a hostile, state sponsor of terror, and this is just wrong,” House Foreign Affairs Committee ranking member Rep. Michael McCaul said.

The amendment's inclusion in the House version of the bill sets up a clash with the Senate. The upper chamber voted on a similar amendment when it considered its version of the NDAA, but could not muster the 60 votes needed for it to pass.

The two chambers will need to reconcile their versions of the bill before sending it to Trump’s desk.

Message end/