According to defapress reporter: some other news sources have stated that the Government of Donald Trump contrary to America's policy of the past few decades are an interview to assess the possibility of transferring nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia, that it can be the start of action on the regional imbalance in the system of deterrence in the Middle East.
The Government of Saudi Arabia of not long ago looking to build power plants and acquisition of nuclear technology and has to be able to reduce its domestic consumption of oil and a large part of their production to export oil but the previous and current American officials believe that the real intentions of the country's uranium enrichment capability In competition with Iran. The U.S. Government previously due to the lack of commitment of certain regulatory safeguards to Saudi Arabia, with the country's opposition to nuclear; but now may be due to the Government's close ties with Riyadh, Washington's policy Trump its previous revisions.
«Christopher Ford of the U.S. National Security Council officials in the field to deal with the dissemination of weapons of mass destruction will trump the State disclosed are an interview with Saudi Government about the transfer of nuclear technology. A Saudi government official last month at a Conference in Abu Dhabi for the first time since the country's intention to extract uranium for use in its nuclear program. This time officials did not mention whether his plan to enrich uranium after it’s extracted to produce nuclear fuel or not. Saudi Arabia has announced up to the end of the year 2018, its first nuclear reactor in partnership with foreign companies will set up. According to the initial estimate, about 60 thousand tons of uranium ore in Saudi in underground mining.
Even imagine the possibility of becoming operational, this claim cannot be news and reflection. Does the American Government really will try their affiliate in the region to equip nuclear technology? Under such circumstances, and balancing of equations related to deterrence in the region will be moved to either side?
But in the current circumstances, the West Asian region this claim even as much as a guess is also rejected, because according to the organizational process of deciding on the foreign policy of the United States all American-based component of the policy of national security interests, and it should be noted in any strategic decision Take place.
For several reasons it can be getting Saudi Arabia's nuclear news about dudes:
3- Recession the market sales in the region of Western Asia, particularly the Persian Gulf.
4-the existence of terrorist takfiri and thinking in the fields of Saudi Arabia.
5-influenced by the global structure of power in putting the international system
In the first case regarding this issue can be pointed out that even the American arms companies about selling some strategic weapons to the Arab country with the Jewish lobby and the leaders of the Zionist regime are having differences of opinion, because selling more than the size of the weapons and the supply of the weapons balance this with advanced technology against the regime. Under such circumstances a regional ally of the United States can no longer be compared to the region's countries according to their own claims of military superiority, because with access to a variety of assault weapons and defensive deterrence level by the Arabic reduces the regime and under such circumstances is a parallel between the Governments of the Affiliate forms When finally competition becomes a boon in the framework of the policies of the American agenda does not seem desirable. As well as between Saudi Arabia and the Zionist regime, the second option (Zionism) in American policy is athrgozarter, so any Guesses in the case of nuclear Zionist dam in the process of with the Saudi decision will be encountered.
The second case related to the independence of the United States, Saudi Arabia's security. If it is impossible on the premise of this country someday will be in the field of nuclear security is an issue for maintaining their survival dependent on expensive American weapons. This is the field of other unpredictable behavior is also created that may even be a step in the direction of the American opposition.
The main example is in this case can be found in East Asia, Korea and Japan. If the United States was the desire of the two countries in security against North Korea will try to supply the country's nuclear weapons, both equipped with up to the size of the military cost to hold the Manor disapproval. With a rational and logical perspective can be easily concluded that the United States never commit such a mistake, why should its military forces from East Asia out, because other individuals for its presence there, the same happened in the case of the fifth fleet In Bahrain and the Persian Gulf is also true. So whatever is causing the security state dependent stranded in favor of the United States, because of their presence in the country continued.
Also, if the nuclear part that will disadvantage the first Saudi private companies will be in the United States military, because the security dilemma and a threat for the country in the region, especially Saudi Arabia Arabic entered the distinctive axis; so other former boom market sales will not be affected, because I enter a stage of stability has been defensive and any threat before it becomes operational will be lost.
The existence of the field of takfiri and terrorist in the country thought Saudi Arabia is another of the reasons that the idea of being pale nuclear Saudi sustains. After the September 11 attacks and Pakistan citizenship being disclosed to attack the world trade twin towers in the United States was focused on Saudi Arabia and look at this from the standpoint of the American policy agenda never will be out Though in the international arena and spent lobbying dollars and too much emphasis on this issue. Background the abuse of nuclear technology in this country is very high, because with the same weapons sold to Iraq, Syria and Yemen war alone manage.
If the Saudi nuclear Russia and China including the main opponents will be the same as it is on the North Korea issue to the extent that is necessary to support the country and prevented from changing the balance in East Asia are in Western Asia as well as such. Examples of this can be found on the landing and the U.S. relationship with Pakistan will see that United States policy will also affect Afghanistan is so any change in the balance of global power structure of regional influence.
According to the mentioned material that can be the result that Saudi will power up that the United States wishes. Even if this country is to find a nuclear technology because of the Interior does not have native Foundation and there is no guarantee of progress in it, to Saudi Arabia.
message end/